Posts Tagged ‘TV’

 The 11th Doctor<< Adam, April 19th, 2010 >>

I was a latecomer to the revamped Doctor Who series. Doctor Who was on hiatus during the 90’s – the years that I would’ve been most likely to sit and watch it. When the series reappeared on the Sci-Fi channel in 2005, I remember watching the first episode in my apartment and being pretty damn entertained. But, as usual for the Sci-Fi channel, new episodes aired on Friday nights, and I was rarely home on Friday nights to watch it.

Flash forward to 2008 or so, and the beauty of streaming NetFlix to my X-Box 360. Once I convinced Katie that the show was totally worth watching (she wasn’t so enamored with the 9th Doctor, but she had a total crush on the 10th), we very quickly pushed through four seasons worth of material. I fell in love with the show to the point where I even named my dog after Rose Tyler (with Katie’s approval, even). We managed to catch up to the currently airing material just in time to watch the “specials” that started airing during the holidays of ’09.

I was very sad to see David Tennant leaving the show. There is a little moment in Time Crash, where the 10th Doctor says to the 5th, “You were my doctor.” I appreciated that slightly fourth-wall breaking moment, and I can relate to the sentiment; I think no matter how long I watch Doctor Who, David Tennant will be my Doctor.

And so we come to the 11th Doctor.  When I pressed Play on my DVR (of course I had plans for Saturday night, but luckily that isn’t an issue with my handy FiOS DVR), I was reminding myself to be open minded.  When the 9th Doctor regenerated into the 10th, I didn’t really have much of a reaction.  I think it is because the 9th Doctor’s tenure was so short, I hadn’t really gotten that attached to him.  I had gotten attached to his relationship to Rose, and was worried where that would go, but I realized that the plot thread could still continue.  I became very attached to the 10th Doctor, though.  I did not want to see him leave.

I think my open mindedness is going to pay off.  I am (so far) enjoying the 11th Doctor.  A lot of interviews leading up to the new season sort of hyped how Matt Smith had this “old soul” sort of sense to him.  I felt like they had to put that out there simply knowing how young Smith is.  But damn if they aren’t correct.  Sure, the season premier starts off goofy; Steven Moffat plays up the “new body” routine in a much larger way than we were shown during the regeneration of the 9th Doctor into the 10th.  I was OK with this; I did find the sequence pretty amusing.  It was the end of the episode that finally gave me pause and reinforced that Smith will be perfectly capable of handling this role.  When the Doctor finally steps up and confronts the bad guys from the premier episode, the goofiness is gone.  Smith delivers a great piece reminding the aliens (and the audience) the he is The Doctor.

Amelia Pond?  I think I’m going to like her, too.  I’m not sure I’ll like her enough to name a puppy after her character (plus, Amy isn’t a very good dog name).  I am very intrigued by the relationship they’ve already managed to build between Amy and The Doctor.  The basis for it is very different than the “in love” relationship with Rose, the “unrequited love” with Martha, and even the “best buds” relationship with Donna.  Here, they’re going with what is clearly Moffat’s chosen theme: fairy tales.  Upon meeting, The Doctor immediately tells Amy that “Amelia Pond” sounds like a name from a fairy tale.  Then, The Doctor becomes Amy’s own private fairy tale character, “The Raggedy Doctor.”  I thought that this set up was very smart.  I’m intrigued to see where they take the relationship.  I hope it doesn’t go in the romantic direction, because frankly, that would be a bit awkward. The fact that The Doctor met Amy as a child first would give anything romantic a slightly creepy tinge. In the past, many of the companion plot lines have involved how the companions make The Doctor a better person. With the revelation at the end of the episode (regarding Amy needing to be back the next morning), I wonder if this companion relationship won’t go the other way. This was touched on with Donna, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it echoed here.

All in all, I was pleased with the season premiere. I’m looking forward to more of this Doctor and Amy. I have high hopes for where the series will go under Moffat’s guidance. He has, after all written some of my favorite episodes. I have some reservations about the fact that he is going back to some of the things he introduced to the Who mythos (the Weeping Angels, and River, in particular). I would hate for the power of those characters and concepts to be diluted by their reuse. Part of the terror of Blink was that it wasn’t The Doctor fighting them. I hope they’re just as scary against the “big guns” of The Doctor, himself.

Time will tell!

No Comments »  

 The Wire: Season 1<< Adam, February 26th, 2010 >>

Finished up watching the first season of The Wire last night. Personally, I’m kind of torn on the series. Not torn enough to not give the second season a chance, but I wasn’t exactly blown away by the first season. Maybe it was because I felt like people had really hyped up the show, and my expectations were off.

This post is minorly spoilery, in terms of themes; I’m going to avoid talking about blatant plot points.

My difficulty stems from one pretty simple fact. When I get invested in some form of entertainment, whether it is TV, movies, books, or video games, I have certain expectations of what I tend to expect out of the protagonists. Mainly, I’m drawn to your stereotypical hero versus villain kind of set up. Consequently, I have certain, shall we say, requirements for my “heroes.”

If you’ve watched The Wire, you already know why I would struggle.

On one side of the story, you have the drug dealers. I’ll give The Wire credit here; it doesn’t try and make many of these characters sympathetic. They do sometimes, and they succeed or fail to greater or lesser extents with them (i.e. D’Angelo doesn’t win my sympathy, but Wallace kind of does). The show doesn’t really try to make excuses for these people; certainly not the people in charge. For that, I appreciate the writing. The whole, “only life I know” angle which often gets played out in these scenarios doesn’t resonate with me (you could probably analyze the reasons for that ad naseum), and luckily The Wire mostly avoids it.

On the other side of the story, you have the police. This is where my trouble starts. I immediately need/want these characters to be heroic, to some extent. After all, they’re police, right? The Wire makes it very clear from the start though, that none of these police are clean. They’ve all got something in the closet. This makes it very hard for me to become invested in any of them; it makes me struggle to keep watching the show as I don’t feel any reason to hope that they succeed.  I’m happy I didn’t give up on the series though, because over the course of the season I was admittedly very impressed with the arc that each police officer has the chance to go through.  Frankly, the unit as a whole goes through pretty much the same plot arc that a comic which creates a new super hero team goes through.  Getting the team together, the internal conflict, the understanding-of-each-other phase through to the you-make-me-better-by-being-around phase.  This, luckily, kept me interested, even as I was on-and-off disgusted with the actions that the officers sometimes took.

I can’t pretend that The Wire doesn’t simply remind me why I often tend towards fantasy/sci-fi fiction.  These genres don’t as often delve into the gray areas of the world; there is good and there is evil.  It’s usually pretty obvious what is good, and what is evil.  When I’m looking for entertainment from fiction, I don’t always enjoy being reminded who gray most of the world really is.  I know how rare the black and white decisions are, that’s why it’s nice to be able to escape to places where heroes are free to be heroic.

1 Comment »